My Two Fingers

Nifty play on words, huh.
I’ve read those who say that you can’t affirm the BFM2K and be a “moderationist.” Needless to say, that’s the single most absurd notion that I’ve heard in a long time. Furthermore, let’s be blunt here, at least one of those allowing such argumentation and not calling it absurd on his blog has stated on the Founders blog that he can agree to the Abstract of Prinicples as long as he gets to define its meaning. Well, quite frankly, if he gets to define the meaning of the Abstract to his liking in order to affirm it, it is grossly inconsistent, if not outright hypocritical of him, not to allow “moderationists” the same respect with regard to the BFM2K…and let’s be honest, the BFM2K only mentions “vice” anyway, so, in order to get from “vice” to “all alcohol use” (not just its abuse) assumes what it needs to prove.

What’s more, the rationale is becoming increasingly ridiculous. It looks something like this: Many of those in opposition are Calvinists. Presbyterians share the same position. Ergo these Baptists are paedobaptist sympathizers. Therefore, we are right, they want us to become Presbyterians, so we should separate from them. Sinners! Excise the Calvinists now!

Then there are the innane comments that said things in reply to questions about why the Reformers and those before did not take the abstinence position like “Romanists are all apostate and the Reformers were too busy to say anything about it.” (my paraphrase). Uh-huh. They were too busy to say anything about alcohol, but not so busy to write reams of material like the Institutes, engage in protracted theological debate, to found theological schools, train hundreds of missionaries, and ultimately lead their successors into several synods, drafting no less than 3 major non-Baptist confessions and 2 major Baptist confessions. Riiiiiight.

Those trotting out SBC history itself would do well to remember the words of James Boyce. Yes, he had something to say about it too. James P. Boyce, founder of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, spoke out against the resolution on alcohol, back in 1888 when he ruled, as President of the SBC, that a resolution against the consumption of alcohol “was not germane to the work of the convention.” (1888 Annual of the SBC, pp. 33-34). So, if they really want to make an argument about “who is the historic Southern Baptist on this issue,” just like the Calvinism issue, they will find themselves losing that battle as well. Of course, this should be expected from those who wish to reinterpret the Abstract of Principles in order to affirm it.

Explore posts in the same categories: Southern Baptist Convention

4 Comments on “My Two Fingers”

  1. johnMark Says:


    Good and simple points. I am willing to bet that, since the attention of this resolution, many of the SB’s in the pews know the resolution better than the BFM2K. If many of these debates I can’t help but wonder how many SB’s actually know what the BFM2K says. Years ago, when I joined an SBC church this confession of faith was never brought up. I never heard about it from the pulpit then and I don’t hear it today. Of course, that’s just me though a few of my friends can attest to the same from their SBC churches.

    As to the Abstracts, why doesn’t anyone care about the history and meaning of this document?


  2. Jeffro Says:


    Great article. It is interesting that the guys who are screaming the loudest seem to populate the Landmarkist camp. I wonder if they will kick us all out? I guess we will have to see what San Antonio holds. I think Ben Cole said they had some good Tequilla down there….just kidding.

  3. johnMark Says:

    Don’t mean to waste space, but it looks like my comment was eaten. I posted it and it looked like it was okay. Now though it’s gone.



  4. charles rosson Says:

    Mean Gene – the writing machine:

    My comment was sent directly to you by e-mail for fear
    that some of our friends might think I was disrespectful
    of my esteemed brother in Christ and fellow Berean!


    Proverb 17:22


    Charles Rosson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: